Friday, November 21, 2014

Tesla Motors Inc. - Porter's Five Forces Analysis

Tesla Motors Inc. was founded in 2003 with its headquarters in Palo Alto, California. The company designs and manufactures electrical vehicles as well as EV power train components. Tesla Motors factory is located in Fremont, California while its design and advanced engineering facilities are located in Hawthorne, California. 

The company is presently mass producing the Model S. It  is the only fully electric vehicle in the planet and is capable of going from 0-100 in 5.6 s which is faster than Porsche Panamera and can travel approximately 320 miles in a single battery charge while providing almost noise free and carbon free emissions.


Tesla Motors have their own sales automobiles showrooms accompanying direct sales to consumers unlike other automakers who work through a third party. Tesla consists of 100 plus retail stores and R&D facilities in over 31 locations worldwide and currently employs over 6000 specialists. The company’s target market is the elite environment conscious customer segment.



An analysis of the Porter’s five forces in relation to the company shows:

Barriers to entry for the electric cars market is quite high since Tesla has already achieved economies of scale with its Roadster model and the Model S. It experiences high revenue volatility due to its continued development in the tech department and research while the company suffers from low sales volume. The capital intensity is a major factor due to this industry requiring a large investment for manufacturing plants as well as the infrastructure needed for electric vehicles charging and maintenance.  Tesla has achieved technical expertise, skilled human resources and brand recognition through years of R&D and training. Logistics and the evolving EV infrastructure also play an important role in this sector.



Supplier bargaining power is low since there is an abundance of suppliers as well as low switching costs. The in-house engine research and development, in house chassis R&D and in house transmission also further contributes to this factor. However the end of the contract with lotus for their Lotus Gliders which were an essential part of the Roadster model lead to the termination of the model’s production. Currently Tesla is sourcing battery cells from Samsung and it also has outsourcing relationships with Daimler and Toyota.

Threat of Substitutes is low due to the other possible substitutes to electric motors being hybrids, flex fuels, hydrogen, diesel, natural gas, mass transportation. All of these still require some amounts of fossil fuels or they lack in performance. Additionally hydrogen and natural gas vehicles require a new complex infrastructure whereas Tesla vehicles are being integrated into the smart grid.



Bargaining power of Buyers is low since Tesla motors offers differentiated offerings which combine prestige, Eco consciousness, luxury and performance. Tesla motors Inc. enjoys low competition in the field of electric vehicle manufacturers, their only other competitors being Toyota Prius, Chevrolet Volt and Nissan Leaf. The substitutes available do not contain all the attributes that Tesla vehicles offer especially due to its current target market being the high income customers. Tesla Motors has retained brand loyalty by providing value added services. Additionally, many government incentives give potential customers tax credit deduction for usage of environmentally safe vehicles.



Therefore the rivalry among the existing competitors is high due to Tesla Motors’ continuous growth over the years which pose a threat to the existing automakers such as Nissan and BMW. Along with Tesla, the two automakers previously mentioned are dominating 80% of the EV automobiles market share with the models Nissan Leaf and FRA:BMW.


Bibliography:

Tesla, BMW And Nissan Are In Talks To Collaborate On Electric Car Charging Standards. (June 16, 2014). Retrieved on 21-11-2014 from http://www.ibtimes.com/tesla-bmw-nissan-are-talks-collaborate-electric-car-charging-standards-1602344

Model S. (N/A). Retrieved on 21-11-2014 from http://www.teslamotors.com/models/specs

Tesla Motors. (N/A). Retrieved on 21-11-2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Motors

Sunday, October 19, 2014

Amazon Vs Alibaba - A Comparative Study into the Two Major E-commerce Giants

Amazon.com was established as an online retail store in 1995 from the garage of its founder Jeff Bezos in Bellevue, Washington, with a product list of mainly books and electronics that were encompassed sometime later. The growth of the company was slow towards the beginning; Amazon did not anticipate profits until 4 or 5 years after its initiation. It made its first profit towards the end of 2001, with a margin of $5 Million from revenue of around $1 Billion.

On the other hand, Alibaba.com was initiated on 1999 by the founder Jack Ma and is centred in China. The website works as a platform for consumer to consumer and business to consumer sales via web portals. Alibaba.com is noted to have raised its first profit two years after its commencement in 2001.

Statistics show that in the year of 2012, Alibaba.com achieved gross sales of $170 Billion which is approximately 43% higher than Amazon’s revenue of $74.4 Billion for the fiscal year 2013. Additionally, Alibaba’s revenue is estimated to reach $420 Billion for 2014. There are a number of reasons for the vast differences in their success. Some of which, being the type of business models each of the two e-commerce sites use and their customer base demographics.

Amazon.com incurs more costs due to their storage facilities, the company has warehouses and customer service centers throughout U.S, U.K, Germany, China, etc. They exercise the process of storing the products in their inventory and delivering to customers from their warehouses when sales are made. They also provide lockers around U.S where one can pick up or return purchases made from the website. Amazon also ventured into producing consumer electronics such as tablets and set-top box systems namely Amazon Kindle, Kindle Fire and Amazon Fire TV by investing in research and development.

Alibaba.com however does not buy and store products in bulk; it provides a means for sellers to display their products for sale to consumers. It initially began by providing a platform for business to business sales for small businesses and later was joined by Taobao, which provides billions of products for retail sale directly from sellers to consumers.

Secondly, the demographics of their customer base also affect their market size. Amazon enjoys its highest consumer segment from United States whose population consists of only 327 million people. Whereas, China holds the largest population by a number 1.4 billion people and results show that 80% of the country’s online sales were made by Alibaba.com. Additionally, research shows that Chinese customers have the highest record of shopping online on average of 8.4 times a month with United States customers next in line at 5.2 times a month.

Alibaba.com makes 80% of its revenue from advertising content on their website and Amazon gains most of their revenue by the regular retail system from sales.

Although both the companies are major E-commerce websites facilitating buying and selling of products online, their unique business models and customer segments show the effective as well as efficient growth of Alibaba over Amazon in the current scenario. 



References: 

- Alibaba is a threat to Amazon, ebay, Walmart & everyone else.(2013). Retrieved at 19-10-2014 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/walterloeb/2013/07/24/alibaba-a-threat-to-amazon-ebay-walmart-and-everyone-else/ 
- AmazonGroup. N/A. Retrieved at 19-10-2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alibaba_Group#Taobao 
- 10 Reasons Why Alibaba blows away Amazon & eBay. (2014). Retrieved at 19-10-2014 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/walterloeb/2014/04/11/10-reasons-why-alibaba-is-a-worldwide-leader-in-e-commerce/